The Wild Card, League Division Series, and MLB’s Postseason

The wild card, three divisions, and the League Division Series they create have had a profound impact on Major League Baseball’s regular and postseason. The 2010 postseason and how they did with regard to TV ratings is examined here.  Two important factors that affect ratings are the market size of the teams involved and the number of games played.  6 and 7 games series give a chance to attract more viewers.-1  Competition for viewship by college football and the NFL also influences MLB’s postseason ratings.  Wikipedia discusses the Nielsen Rating system developed by Nielsen Media Research as measuring audiences in two ways: rating points/shares.  Each rating point equals 1 % of the total TV housesholds. “Share is the percentage of TV sets in use tuned to a program.-2

The League Division Series on TBS  lost ratings  this season.  For 15 games the average rating was 2.8, compared to 3.1 for 13 contests in 2009.  These statistics showed both the postive side of series length( Texas v. Tampa Bay, the LDS’s 1st game 5 since 2005 had a 4.1 share) and the negative impact of competition with the NFL and college football.  Game 4 on Sunday afternoon drew a 1.5 rating.  This was the lowest rating since TBS’ cablecasts started in 2007.-3  On Oct 9, a game between LSU  and FLA on ESPN nosed out NY vs. MIN on TBS 3.1 to 3.0.-4  The average rating for 2010 was even with 2008, but the average viewers were up slightly, 4.434 million to 4.282 million.-5

It is worth noting that when MLB reported the ratings for the LDS they lumped it together with the ALCS (which was also on TBS) that went 6 games and also featured the ratings powerhouse New York Yankees. They report a combined 9% jump over last year.-6     When taken as a seperate entity, the LDS does not have the strength to impact positively on the rest of baseball’s postseason.

As was stated above, the ALCS was on TBS this year.  The NLCS  was on FOX.  Game 2  of the ALCS between New York and Texas was the 2nd most watched program in TBS history with 11.9 million viewers.  Number 1 was the 2008 ALCS  Game 7 between Boston and Tampa Bay (13.4 million).-7   MLB reported that the 6 game ALCS in 2010, with ratings juggernaut New York, did 29% better than 2010.-8  TBS’ 2009 match up was the NLCS between PHI and LAD and went 5 games.-9  MLB’s problem when competing with the NFL was further illustrated, when a mediocre match-up between Tennesee and Jacksonville on Oct 18, beat out the Yankees and Rangers 7.2 to 6.5.-10

While information is sketchy on this years NLCS between San Francisco and Philadelphia on FOX (Blackout of games in New York probably gave FOX and MLB little to brag about),  the two games that were reported show the contrast of the LCS’s positive and negative sides.  Game 2 on Sunday October 17 again pitted the LCS against the NFL and the numbers were not good.  Football at 13.2/20 doubled baseball’s 6.5/10.-11  On the other end, Game 6 was able to hold its own against college football, beating Oklahoma at Missouri among the all-important 18-49 age group, 3.0/9 to 2.1/7.-12

Overall the addition of wild cards, and the LDS that comes along with it, has not fulfilled the promise of making MLB competitive with the NFL  in October.  Furthermore, the percentage of ratings important 6 and 7 game LCSs has declined with the addition of the LDS, going from 67% to 59%.  The best series of all, the full 7 game series, has dropped from 33% to 25%.-13   Once again, baseball can do better.

This year’s World Series between San Francisco and Texas with an average rating of 8.4 and a share of 14 was the lowest rated  in history.  While part of the problem may be attributed to Cablevision’s dispute with FOX in New York,  things did not pick up after getting back on the air for Game 3.-14  The series also lacked the money-making 6th or 7th game.  MLB has not avoided lethal competition with football in primetime, as there are now college games on Friday and Saturday, and the NFL on Sunday night.-15  2010′s Game 4 drew a 10.4 rating while the Steelers and Saints had a 11.8.-16

The fact that this year’s series was the worst in history should not be a surprise.  Wikipedia has listed all rating and share results for the World Series starting in 1984.  Of those 26, the worst 5 are all since 2005 (26th 2010: 8.4/14;  25th 2008: 8.5/14;  24th 2006: 10.1/17;  23rd  2007:  10.7/18;  22nd 2005: 11.1/19).  Even the game’s last 6 and 7 game World Series, in 2009 and 2002 respectively, could not escape the bottom of the list.  The 2009 series was 21st at 11.7/19; and 2002 was 20th at 11.9/20.  Conversely, the top 5 rated series all took place before 1991 (1st 1986: 28.6/45;  2nd 1985: 25.3/39;  3rd 1988: 23.9/39;  4th 1987: 23.8/40;  5th 1991: 23.7/39).  Big market teams could be found in the top 5 (New York, Boston, St Louis, and Los Angeles) and the bottom 7 (Philadelphia, St. Louis, Boston, Chicago,  New York, and Anaheim ).-17

While MLB and TBS can point to major gains in this year’s ALCS, the  picture in general, and the World Series in particular, does not point to a situation that favors the status quo.  Interesting division races between Tampa Bay and New York, Philadelphia and Atlanta, and San Francisco and San Diego did not translate into positive rating growth throughout the postseason.  Competition between baseball and football on many dates is still a major problem.   Improving competition with football in September and October was a major reason for changing MLB’s structure in 1994. 

The lack of real season long pennant races that climax in dramatic fashion in September deprives baseball of a strong product to compete with college football and the NFL.  Baseball believes when they allow more individual teams into the postseason it increases fan interest. In reality, this piecemeal strategy leaves MLB without a strong national product.  It decreases October viewers as their teams drop out of contention.  The Division Series has cut into baseball’s ability to provide its fans with ratings critical 6 and 7 game World Series (see this blogger’s “The Division Series or ‘Killing the Goose’ ” October 8).  When baseball fails to capitalize on it best products, pennant races and the World Series, it fails to broaden out its fan appeal in September and October.  Is it any wonder they end up losing the ratings war to more popular regular season football games? 

With talk of MLB adding teams and games to the postseason, now is the time to discuss alternatives that would improve baseball’s entire season. Season long pennant races that build through September will increase rather than decrease TV audiences;  and keep building  ratings throughout the postseason.  Baseball executives would be wise to explore expanding its August and September coverage with its broadcast partners.  By designating a package of 10-15 games emphasizing pennant race action, baseball will augment viewership for the game’s final months.  This package would replace the LDS and become baseball’s unique answer to the 1st round of baseball’s postseason. 

In these hard economic times, MLB’s entrepreneurs should take the risks necessary to add value and provide  a better product for all baseball fans.  By letting baseball be baseball that risk will pay off with a growing fan base.  Quality teams that have been followed all season will replace large markets as a reason for higher postseason ratings.  A rejuvinated World Series will regain its importance as the sports world’s premier event.  Just what the doctor ordered to increase ratings; and revenues for players and owners alike.

Footnotes:

1- http://fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/why-mlb-postseason-tv-ratings-could-likely-to-be-down.com

    http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/wire?section=mlb&id=5682283  ESPN MLB “TV ratings down for baseball’s division series”  Associated Press

2-http://en.wikipedia.org  “Nielsen ratings”

3- see 1- espn

4- http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-10-12/u-s-cable-television-ratings-for-the-week-of-oct10.html Bloomberg “U.S. Cable Television Ratings for the week of Oct 10″ by Rob Golum Oct 12, 2010

5- http://www.sportsmediawatch,net/2010/10 SMW Sports Media Watch “Division Series Ratings Drop on TBS” Oxt 13, 2010

6, 7, 8, 9- http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20101023&content_id=15813716&vkey=news_mlb&c_id=mlb “TBS postseason coverage ends on high note ALCS Game 6 most watched of season, 2010 rating up 9%” by Jane Lee/MLB.COM 10/23/10

10- http://www.usatoday.com/sports/2010-10-19  USA  Today “TV Ratings:NFL tops baseball despite Yankees’ playoff presence” by Michael Hiestand, USA Today

11- http://www.democratandchronicle.com/article/2010/1019/sports0101/10190307  Democrat and Chronicle.com “NFL vs.MLB on TV? It’s no contest” by Bob Matthews Staff Reporter Oct 19, 2010

12- http://tvbythenumbers.com “TV Ratings Saturday: The Giants Win the Pennant! Missouri Knocks Off Oklahoma, Outlaw Drops” by Robert Seidman Oct 24, 2010

13- http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/history/postseason/mlb_ks.jsp

14- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/world_series_television_ratings

15- http://www.bizofbaseball.com “TV Ratings for Game 1 of 2010 World Series Strong, But DFown From ’09″ by Maury Brown Oct 28, 2010

16- http://content.usatoday.com/communities/thehuddle/post/2010/11 ”NFL’s Steelers-Saints beat MLB’s World Series in TV Rating”

17- same as 14

488 Responses to “The Wild Card, League Division Series, and MLB’s Postseason”

  1. Oren Nizo says:

    Just wanted to say greatwebsite! Thanks for making this info free! I shall visit backto check out your site again soon

  2. Cliff says:

    Thanks! Got any ideas what to do next?

  3. Cliff says:

    Why’s that?

  4. alarmy says:

    It is truely very good post, but I do not see everything completely clear, especially for someone not involved in that topic. Anyway very interesting to me.

  5. David W says:

    Did anyone else see the Broncos game last night?

  6. thanks a lot for another necessary article. Where else could anyone get that type of info in such a consummate way of writing?

  7. Zach says:

    i’m so impressed… keep up the good work! :-)

  8. One of my best reads for this week!

  9. Cliff says:

    What is it that I can clarify?

  10. Your post has completely exceeded my expectations. Since I started off reading through your web page I have found out new info and had old information reinforced. I will recommend several persons that i know.

  11. Since matching for some time for just a proper read in regards to this kinda niche . Attempting in Bing I now spotted this web site . Looking at this information So i am pleased to bring that I have a very good impression I stumbled onto whatever I was ready for. I’ll make sure to don’t forget this website and dedicate it a look systematically.

  12. Great blog!! You should start many more. I love all the info provided. I will stay tuned :)

  13. Here is a reasonable site with a few impressive ideas in one detailed article.

  14. Adolfo Krag says:

    I am certain that your article shall prove more than you are supposed to think Stay in good luck with writting

  15. Hi, I can’t understand how to add your site in my rss reader. Can you help me please?

  16. Cliff says:

    There is none. Sorry.

  17. Cliff says:

    What did you think about the article?

  18. Freakin nice blog .. looking forward to further posts.

  19. johony Bigod says:

    Just wanted to say, it’s all good really.

  20. sears card says:

    Very easily, your post is in fact the top matter for this linked matter. My partner and i remain in your a conclusion and can thirstily count on ones approaching improvements. Only declaring cheers will not just be sufficient, with the huge lucidity within your publishing. I am going to at the same time grab the rss to keep current with just about any improvements.

  21. Cool blog. Thank you! I’ve put your site on my RSS reader!

  22. Dont take this the incorrect way, but youre totally uninteresting me right here. Do not get me incorrect, I imagine what you must say is valid..
    .completely! But, youve was given to give me anything to believe about that requires images. You know what they say, -A picture is really worth a thousand phrases.- You may cut down around the phrases in case you just gave me a few photos.

  23. Have you actually believed about adding somewhat little bit a lot more than just your views? I suggest, what you say is crucial and every thing. But its acquired no punch, no pop! Perhaps in the event you extra a pic or two, a video clip? You could have such a additional powerful website in the event you enable individuals SEE what youre talking about as opposed to just examining it.

  24. I understood it when I was reading it. I expect to see more.

  25. TX DMV says:

    Now that I have thought about it, you might be right.

  26. I’ve recently started a blog, the information you provide on this site has helped me tremendously. Thank you for all of your time & work.

  27. Devin Fate says:

    Ithoroughlylikeit, I would like to say taht it’s niceto drop by and find this post.

  28. sears card says:

    Hello : I have to admit, I’m amazed with your internet site. I needed not any trouble directing through the many navigation bars and information has been quite simple to get into. I ran across things i wished right away whatsoever. Pretty wonderful. Could regards should you include discussion boards as well, it will be the best opportinity for your current clients for you to communicate. Great work!

  29. 監視器 says:

    the information on this submit is really a single of the very best substance that I’ve actually appear throughout. I adore your submit, I will appear back again to examine for new posts.

  30. I hope you will keep updating your content constantly as you have one dedicated reader here.

  31. for sharing! your unique perspective on this.

  32. klocki lego says:

    It is truely very good post, but I do not see everything completely clear, especially for someone not involved in that topic. Anyway very interesting to me.

  33. I think some of this data could have been plagiarized, it’s all over the web and various peoples websites, unless you’re the first author?. Thanks Energy bill is our specialty.

  34. online radio says:

    I’m actually not as well accustomed to this subject matter but I do wish to have a look at blogs for layout recommendations and intriguing subjects. You honestly described a matter that I regularly really don’t care much about and produced it awfully fascinating. This is a great weblog that I will take note of. I already bookmarked it for future reference. Thank you

  35. facebook says:

    You make blogging look like a walk in the park! I’ve been trying to blog daily but I just cant find writing material.. you’re an inspiration to me and i’m sure many others!

  36. Jeffery Sipe says:

    Good post, thank you. I signed to your blog rss feed.

  37. I’ve bookmarked, Dugg, and I brought together the RSS subscription. Thanks! .

  38. Keep posting stuff like this i really like it

  39. klocki lego says:

    it is a really nice point of view. I usually meet people who rather say what they suppose others want to hear. Good and well written! I will come back to your site for sure!

  40. Perry Gadd says:

    Another amazing article that I just found.

  41. Not a bad take on the subject… now let see how things pan out :-)

  42. Thank you for another informative blog. Where else could I get that kind of info written in such a perfect way? I have a project that I am just now working on, and I have been on the look out for such information.

  43. I’ve bookmarked, Dugg, and I joined the RSS subscription. Thanks! .

  44. Cliff says:

    Where else have you seen this?

  45. Cliff says:

    I’m not waiting, I’m actting. Suggest you do the same.

  46. Thanks for the article, nice read.

  47. Cliff says:

    Thanks! So what’s to be done?

  48. meladerm says:

    Great post about this. I’m surprised to see someone so educated in the matter.

  49. Ma Tollerson says:

    you mad freak! That’s brilliant!

  50. Thank you very much for your great article. I have been looking for such message for a very long time. Not all your content is completely clear to me, but it is definitely interesting and worth reading.

Leave a Reply